Overflow

Friday, October 31, 2003

Codependence

Filed under: Spirit — cody @ 7:41 am

Maya — only recently have I learned her name — is my mistress. Though I have known her all my life, I have just started to see her more clearly.

I have become enmeshed with Maya, same as everyone who meets her, really. I am enchanted by her beauty, awed by her elegance. Maya teaches me, helps me make sense of life. Maya is my drug of choice, kind of like caffiene, which helps me function in the everyday world with its profanity and rudeness. She seduces me effortlessly and I come to her more often than I know I should, often late at night or as a refuge in moments of weakness.

I allow myself the conceit that I am among the more adept of her many suitors. I believe I can coax out her secrets, bend her and use her for my purposes. But, make no mistake, I am often at her mercy, doing her bidding. She is truly a high-maintainence mistress.

I wear her like a cloak, sometimes like a suit of armor, often like a veil. She weighs me down, wearies and frustrates me, misleads me, confuses me. She obscures my vision - tricks me into thinking I am truly wise.

Maya makes me think that I cannot survive apart from her. And maybe I can’t, but I can start to see through some of her lies.

Maya, you see, is illusion. Her name is a Hindu word for the “idle veil” which clouds our awareness of the true nature of reality. Maya is the world of words, theories, propositions, truths, conventions, laws, definitions, instrumentalities, and metal models. Maya enables us to articulate and organize life as we experience it into convenient groupings for easy digestion. Through Maya we impose our ideas upon reality by classifying, measuring, and arranging concepts so we can understand and deal with them. Maya is all in our heads.

The danger comes when Maya is confused with reality. When all we see is Maya instead of seeing through her. When we live for her instead of just live. This I believe is what E.E. Cummings referred to when he warned against letting “being pay the rent of seem”. Maya is “seem.” We must, above all, “be.”

Maya is very useful and necessary. But Maya is also overbearing and demanding. She cannot be ruthlessly tossed aside, but her illusions and manipulations must be seen for what they are. And for what they are not. She is indeed a veil and she must be seen through. And seeing through a veil calls for a more focused vision.

I make my living dealing in Maya. Essentially I push information around, arranging it in time order, controlling its exposition. I unpack little boxes of Maya and put the contents into other little boxes of Maya. My job is to recognize patterns in the way these boxes are packed and think up better ways to pack them. To draw connections between seemingly unrelated boxes of Maya and create rules of thumb for others to deal with Maya.

Of course, the rules and patterns I create are Maya. The little boxes are Maya. Software process is Maya. Most of my hard-won “booklearnin’” is maya. Blogging is Maya. This post is Maya too.

I have come to see my dependence on Maya and that I am powerless over her. That, according to the Friends of Bill W., is the first step.

Thursday, October 30, 2003

New Kid on the Block

Filed under: Family — cody @ 9:55 am

We brought a newborn home from the hospital yesterday. Her longer-term foster family can’t take her yet, so she’s crashing at our pad for a week or so.

She’s very newbornish — teensy at six pounds, closed eyes, skin about four different colors, cone head. Her name is Marie. She is, of course, adorable. And she is, like, a total chick magnet. (Some good that does me now, huh?)

I think before I said we’d sworn off newborns in favor of fostering older children, but they were desperate for the placement and we still had most of that baby stuff. And it’s temporary.

And she’s so gosh darn cute.

Tuesday, October 28, 2003

Vanilla guy

Filed under: Life — cody @ 2:30 pm

When I was young and the choices were few, I’d take strawberry if chocolate wasn’t available. Anything but boring old vanilla.

Now that I have forty some-odd flavors of ice cream to choose from (not counting crush-in purmutations) my favorite flavor is — boring old vanilla.

(And even when you order vanilla nowadays, you have to be specific. Natural Vanilla Bean, thanks.)

I remember being excited when ranch dressing was invented. Yes I’m that old. We had another choice! Something besides Italian, French, and Thousand Island!

And when they brought out Tropical Punch flavored drink? Whoa. You could have *more than one* flavor of punch at a time? Who knew?

It was all very exciting as a kid. But now it’s the *choices* that bore me. Strawberry Durian Smoothies? Yawn. Habanero Portabello dip with blue cheese blue corn chips? Ho Hum. Serve me a Shiner and some Ruffles please.

(I hear Shiner is marketing a light beer now. That’s just wrong. More choice is not always better.)

So I go to the vending machine today for some Fritos to put in my tomato soup and what do I find? Chili Cheese Fritos, Cool Ranch Doritos, some Harvest Cheddar Sun Chips (Does anyone actually *harvest* cheddar anyway?) I just want some plain old Fritos. Lacking that, I just want the plain version of something. Anything, as long as it’s the original flavor.

I am a one man backlash. I suspect that all this choice we’re being sold is distracting us away from quality. If I get rid of the steamed milk and vanilla syrup, I can tell whether the coffee I’m being sold is good coffee or not. And at four bucks a pop, I damn well better get some good coffee. Sometimes plain is plain better.

When I eat chocolate, I eat the plain dark stuff. As much cocoa as they can get in there. When I drink coffee, I drink coffee. Black. Full caf. No whip. I take my liquor on the rocks or neat. And when I have my choice of ice cream, I choose Vanilla.

Words nail me

Filed under: Work — cody @ 6:26 am

The following words were used in the peer personal feedback in my recent training at work:

sensitive open bookish agreeable rambling unrealistic caring strategist mushy sweet verbose “up in the clouds” philosophical interruptive opinionated outgoing supportive non-linear resourceful patient fickle easily distracted knowledgeable impatient with details forgetful broad in outlook unorthodox laid back diplomatic

Pretty much nailed me.

Also telling were the available words they *didn’t use* for me

technically skillful insular perfectionist efficient disciplined clever “good at follow through” aggressive competitive professionally dedicated tough opportunistic shrewd resistant to change

Nailed me again.

I should be heartened that my observers’ feedback pretty much matched my own. That might mean I have a pretty clear self-concept. But still, it’s one thing to know one’s weaknesses and yet another to have others confirm them in frank language.

Also, the self-examination involved in the past week is bringing me to a decision about my career. One where I surrender to a direction in which I am being drawn and give up my direct involvement in “technical work” — what my colleagues call “real work” — entirely. It is clear that my talents lie in being a team-builder, a facilitator, a big-picture guy, an idea guy, and a coordinator. This realization is kind of scary for me. Change is scary. But I do myself and my company no favors by pretending to be a code-slinging software geek when that’s not my true nature. The question is, what kind of place can I make for the real me when I don’t have the fundamentals of production to fall back on?

To be continued.

Monday, October 27, 2003

Baking Humble Pies

Filed under: Work — cody @ 5:09 pm

I started out as a real live software developer. My fellow software engineers used to refer to what I do as “real work.” I enjoyed designing and coding software, just like many of you out there. I dreaded documentation and software process forms, just like many of you.

Nowadays, the words my fellow software engineers use to refer to what I do can’t be used in polite company. I refer to software process documents by their numbers. I can quote whole passages on test report standards. I know the definition of “tailoring option” and find myself arguing the finer points of peer review procedure.

Yes, I have become a process weenie. I have joined the lowest caste of my field. A caste reserved for the likes of ISO auditors, TQM instructors, and certain Q/A personnell. My work, or at least what I spend the majority of my time on, what I put my energy and heart into, what I am, though I know better, personally attached to, is generally reviled and ridiculed throughout the software engineering world.

How, do you ask, did I sink to such a sad state? It’s similar to how an idealistic young politician becomes a cynical, corrupt old politician. The hubris of the reformer. Got involved in one area, thinking I could stay above the process weenie level while injecting what I saw is “common sense” into one area of testing process. I leaned in too close, and the hydra that is the software process oversight committee grabbed me, and I was history.

In my more optimistic moments I see myself as an aspiring software engineering bodhisattva. Doing the parts of the software engineering job that no one else wants to do, freeing up others to pursue higher tasks. I take refuge in incrementalism, fighting process creep wherever I see it, trying to get people to think of process intent vs. process costs, trying to make process change as painless as possible.

But who am I kidding? Implementing process change is like doing root canals. Unless the drugs are really good, no one really cares how painless you tried to make it.

Sigh.

Thursday, October 23, 2003

Family Notes

Filed under: Family — cody @ 6:37 am

Father-in-law is doing better and is undergoing tests. Looks like it wasn’t a heart attack per se, but other problems they’re still investigating. Thanks for your prayers and thoughts.

Girlzilla has the flu. Now it begins.

Had Petunia’s first parent-teacher conference yesterday. The teachers said she was bright and independent. The teachers were very surprised to hear that Petunia could talk. Apparently she has not said one word in over two months at preschool. Not one word. This is in stark contrast to Petunia at home. Kids are weird.

Wednesday, October 22, 2003

Matters of Heart

Filed under: Family — cody @ 5:56 am

At 1:00 this morning, my father-in-law drove himself to the hospital with a suspected heart attack. He is now in the care of doctors resting comfortably, but there are many anxious, unanswered questions. Please make a space for him in your thoughts today — him and his wife who would be very literally lost without him.

I will be in an intense all-day training session that barely leaves me time to go to the bathroom (it is a little like Est that way), much less worry properly about my family, so please pray for me.

I’m not asking you to direct prayers for my benefit though. When the desert fathers said “pray for me,” they were referring to the fact that, even though they were to “pray without ceasing” as their goal, they still had to sleep. So they would literally cover for one another in prayer. The words “Pray for me.” meant to pray in one’s stead. So, since my mind will necessarily be occupied with less important things all day, could some of you who pray please pull some of my load and be mindful where I cannot? Much obliged.

Not a Feeling

Filed under: Love — cody @ 5:42 am

“When they reach perfection I relieve them of this
lover’s game of going and coming back. I call it
a “lover’s game” because I go away for love and I
come back for love — no, not really I, for I am
your unchanging and unchangeable God; what goes
and comes back is the feeling my charity creates
in the soul.”

- Catherine of Siena -

Love is not a feeling. When I confuse my feelings of love with Love, I perceive that Love comes and goes, when in fact Love is always present and available to me. Love is constant and I am the one in flux. But in any moment I have the potential to decide to Love, regerdless of my feelings. I take great comfort in that potential, even when I myself am far from feeling loving myself.

Monday, October 20, 2003

NEST building resource

Filed under: Life — cody @ 2:21 pm

Now, this is useful. If you own a home, there is a free program that will help you compare options for home repair solutions. It’ll even help you determine estimated costs of repairs based on local material costs and local labor rates using your zip code. It’s called National Economic Service-life Tools or NEST.

Sunday Go To Meetin’

Filed under: Family — cody @ 10:25 am

Sunday morning, sitting on the bench in the front yard with my wife reading the paper, it hit me. This is better than Church.

Just the right mix of nature and neighbors, sun and shade, solitude and company. And no better sermon than that of children playing unselfconsciously on their own, inspecting the grass and throwing leaves into the air to watch them float to earth. I can feel as much of God’s Graces from watching the babies as from the most erudite and inspiring of homilies.

All this made a very nice start to a day of diapers and dishes. Gave me the base of Love from which I could say, “No, you may not have pudding for breakfast.” and “You will too turn off that TV and help your mother.” and “Don’t push your sister. Tell her you’re sorry.” Just enough balm for the soul that the flare of irritation at my wife for being hurried from one work task to another did not push aside that ever present truth that this too was my Beloved. Enough perspective to make my way to bed last night past dented furniture and stacks of unsorted mail, stepping over toys and little unidentified objects, thanking my lucky stars for all these riches. But not so much Peace that I was not very happy to be finally in bed and drifting off to sleep.

So except for Eucharist, which we received yeasterday evening together, morning outside was as good as any Church. In fact, it was Church.

Saturday, October 18, 2003

Halloween treats

Filed under: Family — cody @ 1:55 pm

This is a good idea for Halloween treats. We always struggle with how to give out healthy snacks and not be the Scroogey family on the block. We’ve given out drinks in the past and gotten a good reception. But maybe we could get this year’s treats at the Balloon and Novelty Store.

Friday, October 17, 2003

Music Hath Charms…

Filed under: Music — cody @ 2:05 pm

Music hath charms that soothe the savage…. College Student. And it doesn’t seem to matter what kind of music or even what culture the music is from.

Apostate

Filed under: Futures — cody @ 9:02 am

(I’m talking to fellow futurists here. If your eyes glaze over, I apologize.)

I may be losing my faith as a futurist

I’ve been wondering why futures has not taken off as a field. And I wonder if we futurists, well, live in the future too much.

Is it possible that the very core of the futurist canon is flawed, that focusing on preferred futures inspires a certain inattentiveness to present reality? When we tell stories about the future, do people regard us as a certain irrelevant novelty? When we project the future, do we distance ourselves from the present? If not, then why is finding success stories in our field so difficult?

Is futures studies in its essence wrapped up in craving, aversion, clinging, and desires for states other than Now, which is the only moment that currently exists?

Now don’t get me wrong, I am grateful for the skills I learned in the futures program, the ones that help me uncover assumptions, see hidden structures, and perceive more deeply the present moment. I appreciate being able to put Now in context with past history and future possibilities. I appreciate learning the tools of anticipation and planning.

Yes, a certain amount of anticipation of the future is needed for skillful living. But skillfulness requires that anticipation be connected *strongly* back to the present. But that’s where I think we are weak.

It feels to me like we futurists are prophets who are so enamored of being in the presence of the burning bush that we don’t do a good job of taking the tablets back down the mountain. Back to Now. Back where people live.

I know that this is exactly the opposite of the assertions in Intro — that people live too much in the present and never consider the future. Hence my “crisis of faith.”

Have you ever tried to convince a boss, a customer, a regular joe that the futures mindset is valuable and been exasperated at how “they just don’t get it?” In that moment, have you ever stopped to wonder exactly which one of you doesn’t “get it?”

Small Small Small

Filed under: Life — cody @ 8:10 am

After deleting my three hundred quazillionth piece of P.E-NI=S enlargement spam this morning, I’ve decided I’ve had enough.

Something needs to be said: P.E-NI=Ses are small. Live with it.

My P.E-NI=S is small. Your P.E-NI=S is small. Face it. It’s a small organ. In absolute terms, it’s a small thing.

And relative to the, um, organ which is its female counterpart and gracious host during coitus, it is small.

Yes, in any normal statistical distribution of a natural phenomenon, such as P.E-NI=S size, there are a few individuals that fall beyond the three sigma line. While theirs might put yours to shame, theirs are still small

Small small small. P.E-NI=Ses are small. Say it with me.

A man’s P.E-NI=S should be attached to his body. Not his ego. It is such P.E-NI=S/ego attachment that is responsible for all that damned detestable spam. So could we all just drop it?

And ladies, while it should not be necessary, all us guys would appreciate a little reassurance. It’s very difficult to drop an ego attachment. We’ll help you with yours. No, those jeans do not make your butt look fat.

Thursday, October 16, 2003

Self Mastery

Filed under: Spirit — cody @ 1:54 pm

The fool tries to control his mind.
How can he ever succeed?

Mastery always comes naturally
To the man who is wise
And who loves himself.

-Ashtavakra Gita 18:41

A reminder: It’s not what *I* do…

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress